A Brief History Of Chevron’s Shameless Response To Its Toxic Mess In Ecuador

Written by Mike G

Topics: Oil

share this story
facebook twitter email stumble upon
Get Energy Alerts

Chevron oil handAs detailed in our video, “Great Moments In Stupid Chevron PR” (view it below), Chevron will say anything to evade its responsibility to clean up its toxic mess in Ecuador. The company has tried just about every dirty trick it could come up with, too.

Chevron’s immediate response to the decision in Ecuador was to have its lawyers file a motion requesting a court order that would stop the plaintiffs from being able to pursue the company’s assets around the world (Chevron no longer has any assets in Ecuador). US Federal Judge Lewis Kaplan denied Chevron’s motion. It was the first time he’s ever made a ruling against Chevron.

This was just one of the abusive legal maneuvers Chevron has attempted, engineered by the company’s outside law firm, Gibson Dunn Crutcher, and the partner at the firm leading the Chevron case, Randy Mastro. Gibson Dunn specializes in cases like Chevron’s:

Gibson Dunn has long advertised itself as the “dream team” for clients in serious trouble. It boasts that lawyers like Mastro, Andrea Neumann, Scott Edelman, and William Thomson are capable of mounting “rescue” operations for corporations facing major liability for environmental and other abuses committed against vulnerable peoples like the indigenous and farmer communities of Ecuador’s Amazon. If the law is in the way of a client’s interests, GDC claims it will work to either change the law or maneuver around it. …

What few know is that Gibson Dunn basically uses carbon copy lawsuits alleging “fraud” against almost any entity that has the temerity to challenge its powerful clients.

To get Chevron out of its mess, Gibson has targeted Ecuadorian lawyer, Pablo Fajardo, who was profiled with great sensitivity in Vanity Fair. Fajardo brilliantly has outmaneuvered Chevron’s high-priced lawyers at almost every turn.

Chevron has a long history of going after anyone who dares side with the Ecuadorean plaintiffs and against Chevron. Another target of Chevron and Gibson Dunn’s vicious retributive legal tactics was Crude director Joe Berlinger. Chevron’s lawyers at Gibson Dunn subpoenaed the outtakes from that film, which is about the Ecuadorean plaintiffs’ struggle to bring Chevron to justice. The New York Times recently wrote a lengthy piece on the financial and emotional toll Chevron’s abusive legal tactics took on Berlinger.

Given its deep pockets, Chevron no doubt assumed it would have worn down the Ecuadorean plaintiffs and simply outlasted their ability to continue fighting for justice. But just in case that didn’t pan out, Chevron has pretty much tried every other dirty trick it could conceive of as well:

No attempt to evade its responsibility for cleaning up Ecuador has worked for Chevron. I’m sure the company would appreciate it if you could help suggest a new excuse or two to explain why it still refuses to take responsibility for its environmental and human rights crisis in Ecuador. Here’s a little inspiration:

3 Comments For This Post I'd Love to Hear Yours!

  1. George Salner says:

    If the oil, crude OR refined, is all that benign for the environment,
    people made ill by it and/or the Ecuadoran rain forest poisoned by it, I challenge Chevron’s pro-oil protagonists to drink an 8 ounce glassful
    of this “heavenly nectar” either straight from the well head or directly from the storage tank that houses the “refined” product.
    If you cannot put your “convictions” to the test, STFU Chevron and Chevronites, clean up your mess without any further patently absurd, pathetic and stupid attempts, which are only delaying tactics, through the courts.

  2. Dr Dennis Tafe says:

    It’s time we stood up to environmental vandals though many of these people don’t see themselves in this light. Making money is one thing. Causing huge environmental damage can be proven and once it is proven these people should be held to account. As an Australian marine biologist I will be lobbying our government to keep Chevron out of Australian waters.

  3. Elizabeth Stephens says:

    Because of Chevron, the naturally occurring toxins from the ground, ARE toxic, and are a direct result of UNNATURAL TOXINS from Chevron. They will not clean it up, because it cannot be cleaned. The land has absorbed Chevrons toxic waste for to long already. Chevron is waiting for the filth to disperse or sink so far into the ground until it is undetectable. Maybe Chevron lawyers should stick their heads in the ground, instead of up each others asses.

Trackbacks For This Post

  1. Suran's Blog !!! » Blog Archive » Great Moments In Stupid Chevron PR

Leave a Comment Here's Your Chance to Be Heard!

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.