<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Waxman &#8211; Markey Bill: A step forward for REDD?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://understory.ran.org/2009/09/24/the-waxman-markey-bill-a-step-forward-for-redd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://understory.ran.org/2009/09/24/the-waxman-markey-bill-a-step-forward-for-redd/</link>
	<description>The Understory is the official blog of Rainforest Action Network.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:08:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Understory &#187; Why the U.S. is Strong on REDD but Weak on Climate</title>
		<link>http://understory.ran.org/2009/09/24/the-waxman-markey-bill-a-step-forward-for-redd/comment-page-1/#comment-389337</link>
		<dc:creator>The Understory &#187; Why the U.S. is Strong on REDD but Weak on Climate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://understory.ran.org/?p=4021#comment-389337</guid>
		<description>[...] below 1990 levels by 2020, and the U.S. climate legislation calls for only 4%. This past summer, RAN opposed the Waxman Markey bill in the House of Representatives for many reasons, the largest being the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] below 1990 levels by 2020, and the U.S. climate legislation calls for only 4%. This past summer, RAN opposed the Waxman Markey bill in the House of Representatives for many reasons, the largest being the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: His_wife18</title>
		<link>http://understory.ran.org/2009/09/24/the-waxman-markey-bill-a-step-forward-for-redd/comment-page-1/#comment-380391</link>
		<dc:creator>His_wife18</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://understory.ran.org/?p=4021#comment-380391</guid>
		<description>In the decline of civilization, communities do not go down by the same path by which they came up. ,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the decline of civilization, communities do not go down by the same path by which they came up. ,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Understory &#187; Seeing the Rainforests for the Trees in the Senate Climate Bill</title>
		<link>http://understory.ran.org/2009/09/24/the-waxman-markey-bill-a-step-forward-for-redd/comment-page-1/#comment-375624</link>
		<dc:creator>The Understory &#187; Seeing the Rainforests for the Trees in the Senate Climate Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://understory.ran.org/?p=4021#comment-375624</guid>
		<description>[...] for protecting forests. But if the Senate bill is as bad as the House ACES bill was, then REDD is poised to do more harm than good. In order to actually protect forests, the Senate bill&#8217;s forest provisions [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for protecting forests. But if the Senate bill is as bad as the House ACES bill was, then REDD is poised to do more harm than good. In order to actually protect forests, the Senate bill&#8217;s forest provisions [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

