APRIL, the pulp and paper giant, violates Indonesian laws and community rights

Written by David Gilbert

Topics: Pulp and Paper

share this story
facebook twitter email stumble upon
Get Forest Alerts

The Kampar peninsula in Riau, Sumatra has become a center of expansion of the pulp and paper industry. Once entirely peat forest and peat swamp habitats, the most carbon rich forests in the world, the Kampar is being rapidly converted to Acacia tree plantations.

This month, Asia Pacific Resources International Holdings Limited (APRIL), one of the world’s largest paper producers, has been reeling from negative pressures on two fronts.

The Indonesian environmental NGO Eyes on the Forest (EoF) has released an investigative report questioning the legality of APRIL’s clearing of the Kerumutan peat swamps.

In their report, available HERE, EoF establishes that an APRIL subsidiary, PT Sumatera Riang Lestari, is currently clearing forest that is designated ‘Hutan Lindung’ or protected forest, in direct violation of Indonesia’s forestry laws. Additionally, the Kerumutan is peat over 3 meters deep, which is also strictly protected by Indonesian law.

Photo by Eye on the Forest Indonesia

Photo by Eyes on the Forest Indonesia

The Kerumutan meets all criteria of High Conservation Forest, as defined by the Forest Stewardship Council, and is a key habitat for the endangered Sumatran Tiger. Over the past 6 months, four tigers have been killed and 4 men have been injured in two separate incidents of human-tiger conflict just outside of PT Sumatera Riang Lestari’s operating area.

EoF calls on APRIL  to abide by Indonesian law and  immediately stop forest clearing in Kerumutan.

Across the Kampar peninsula, the community of Teluk Meranti is struggling  protect their traditional forest lands from APRIL. In a letter issued in June, Teluk Meranti rejects the presence of Riau Andalan Pulp and Paper (RAPP), another APRIL subsidiary in the Kampar:



Teluk Meranti, 20 June 2009



To the Honourable,

President Director of RAPP company (APRIL)

With this, the community of Teluk Meranti subdistrict, based on our needs to the land located across the river or land intended to become a part of your company’s operational area, declares that it: REJECTS THE PRESENCE OF THE RAPP COMPANY.

This is done with regard to the below considerations:

  1. The land is to be retained for our grandchildren’s future
  2. Experiences by other surrounding villages or areas where RAPP company has operated which have impacted negatively on the local community’s rights
  3. It has caused loss of agricultural and horticultural land belonging to the community
  4. The community will lose the source of its livelihood (economic, social and cultural) from the forest which will be converted to an industrial timber plantation

We, the community of Teluk Meranti, have inhabited and utilised this area in a wise and traditional way far preceeding Indonesia’s independence.

Thus concludes this rejection letter, made with great consideration so that unwanted problems will be avoided in the future.

Respectfully yours,

The community of Teluk Meranti


August 17th the Forest Peoples Program issued a letter to the Director of RAPP encouraging RAPP and APRIL to respect Teluk Meranti’s right to self-determination and the internationally recognized Free, Prior, and Informed, and Consent (FPIC) standard. The letter has gained 27 Indonesian and international signatories

Interestingly the letter points out that the then Director of RAPP confirmed his company’s commitment to the FPIC standard when establishing new plantations. In the coming months RAN will be following RAPP’ response closely to see if they live up to their own commitments and respect Teluk Meranti’s desire, in their own words, to see that their land is “retained for their grandchildren’s future.”

David Gilbert is a Research Fellow at RAN. He has worked in the tropical forests of the Amazon and Indonesia, with a special focus on forest conservation and indigenous rights.

1 Comment For This Post I'd Love to Hear Yours!

  1. Nigel May says:

    I am a Geography teacher at a school in London Borough of Redbridge. I have concerns about our School’s use of ‘PaperONE’ products from APRIL given terrible environmental record. Having raised this concern which was passed onto the paper merchants (Fred’k Johnson), the company boss came in to speak to our reprographics lady and left a lot of info in the form of printed off web-pages which seem to portray APRIL as some sort of saintly guardian of the ecosystem (compared to APP) – this included pages from WWF (www.worldwildlife.org/who/media/press/2008). Is this just a load of ‘Greenwash’? Should I continue to press for an alternative source of paper (preferably FSC accredited) to be used? Regards – Nigel May (Ilford County High School)

Trackbacks For This Post

  1. The Understory » President Director of APRIL subsidiary responds to Rainforest Action Network
  2. The Understory » Sumatra hunger strike: the last recourse for a forest community
  3. Sumatra hunger strike: the last recourse for a forest community | Mobilization for Climate Justice

Leave a Comment Here's Your Chance to Be Heard!

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.