<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big Oil takes lessons from the left, loses hilariously</title>
	<atom:link href="http://understory.ran.org/2009/01/28/big-oil-takes-lessons-from-the-left-loses-hilariously/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://understory.ran.org/2009/01/28/big-oil-takes-lessons-from-the-left-loses-hilariously/</link>
	<description>The Understory is the official blog of Rainforest Action Network.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:59:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://understory.ran.org/2009/01/28/big-oil-takes-lessons-from-the-left-loses-hilariously/comment-page-1/#comment-294912</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://understory.ran.org/?p=2158#comment-294912</guid>
		<description>Annie, your story is great and I like your interpretation: that Big Oil is trying to do grassroots organizing, and that they failed miserably in this case, &quot;losing hilariously.&quot; Us against them, environmentalists and industry, winner and loser is certainly a part of this story.

But I have a slightly different interpretation of the final result: Environmentalist advocates and an industry advocate both tried grassroots organizing, and instead of resulting in a winner and a loser (like a formal debate), it resulted in... a dialogue: &quot;a surprisingly good, long conversation.&quot;

Check out these resources at the Mediators Foundation for some good ideas related to this interpretation and how to turn debates into dialogues: &quot;6 Forms of Discourse,&quot; &quot;The Fifteen Obstacles to Dialogue,&quot; &quot;The Debate/Dialogue Chart,&quot; &quot;Moving Beyond Debate: Start a Dialogue&quot;:

http://www.mediatorsfoundation.org/resources.html

We can&#039;t always have dialogues, but when we do, they can be very productive!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Annie, your story is great and I like your interpretation: that Big Oil is trying to do grassroots organizing, and that they failed miserably in this case, &#8220;losing hilariously.&#8221; Us against them, environmentalists and industry, winner and loser is certainly a part of this story.</p>
<p>But I have a slightly different interpretation of the final result: Environmentalist advocates and an industry advocate both tried grassroots organizing, and instead of resulting in a winner and a loser (like a formal debate), it resulted in&#8230; a dialogue: &#8220;a surprisingly good, long conversation.&#8221;</p>
<p>Check out these resources at the Mediators Foundation for some good ideas related to this interpretation and how to turn debates into dialogues: &#8220;6 Forms of Discourse,&#8221; &#8220;The Fifteen Obstacles to Dialogue,&#8221; &#8220;The Debate/Dialogue Chart,&#8221; &#8220;Moving Beyond Debate: Start a Dialogue&#8221;:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mediatorsfoundation.org/resources.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.mediatorsfoundation.org/resources.html</a></p>
<p>We can&#8217;t always have dialogues, but when we do, they can be very productive!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
