<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Majority Oppose Mountaintop Removal Mining; Find Protecting Environment Good for Economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://understory.ran.org/2008/10/24/majority-oppose-mountaintop-removal-mining-find-protecting-environment-good-for-economy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://understory.ran.org/2008/10/24/majority-oppose-mountaintop-removal-mining-find-protecting-environment-good-for-economy/</link>
	<description>The Understory is the official blog of Rainforest Action Network.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:33:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Woodin Jr.</title>
		<link>http://understory.ran.org/2008/10/24/majority-oppose-mountaintop-removal-mining-find-protecting-environment-good-for-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-260269</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Woodin Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://understory.ran.org/?p=1674#comment-260269</guid>
		<description>The ecological renewal rate is tha amount of time required to regenerate a renewable natural resource or restore and stabalize biological, chemical, or physical conditions altered by use or pollution.   with mountain top removal, the natural resource is lost forever, plus exposing water reserviors to polluted containment runoffs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ecological renewal rate is tha amount of time required to regenerate a renewable natural resource or restore and stabalize biological, chemical, or physical conditions altered by use or pollution.   with mountain top removal, the natural resource is lost forever, plus exposing water reserviors to polluted containment runoffs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teri</title>
		<link>http://understory.ran.org/2008/10/24/majority-oppose-mountaintop-removal-mining-find-protecting-environment-good-for-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-260161</link>
		<dc:creator>Teri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://understory.ran.org/?p=1674#comment-260161</guid>
		<description>If this is a picture of Carr Fork it is a old one because the same mining that is seen on one side of this reservoir has happened on the other side also.  Just think this is the water source for lots of communities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this is a picture of Carr Fork it is a old one because the same mining that is seen on one side of this reservoir has happened on the other side also.  Just think this is the water source for lots of communities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
