<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dispatches from Fantasy CCS-Land</title>
	<atom:link href="http://understory.ran.org/2008/05/06/dispatches-from-fantasy-ccs-land/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://understory.ran.org/2008/05/06/dispatches-from-fantasy-ccs-land/</link>
	<description>The Understory is the official blog of Rainforest Action Network.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:33:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nancy LaPlaca</title>
		<link>http://understory.ran.org/2008/05/06/dispatches-from-fantasy-ccs-land/comment-page-1/#comment-198756</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy LaPlaca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 23:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://understory.ran.org/?p=1002#comment-198756</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the dispatch, Becky.

These coal companies should wake up and start buying Concentrating Solar Power and wind companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the dispatch, Becky.</p>
<p>These coal companies should wake up and start buying Concentrating Solar Power and wind companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://understory.ran.org/2008/05/06/dispatches-from-fantasy-ccs-land/comment-page-1/#comment-196851</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 01:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://understory.ran.org/?p=1002#comment-196851</guid>
		<description>It would be great if the government would enact a moratorium on coal plants that don&#039;t capture 100% of their carbon emissions (on their own dime), because that would mean no coal plants at all for at least a couple of decades. It would also be great if it rained ice cream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be great if the government would enact a moratorium on coal plants that don&#8217;t capture 100% of their carbon emissions (on their own dime), because that would mean no coal plants at all for at least a couple of decades. It would also be great if it rained ice cream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://understory.ran.org/2008/05/06/dispatches-from-fantasy-ccs-land/comment-page-1/#comment-196841</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 01:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://understory.ran.org/?p=1002#comment-196841</guid>
		<description>Why wouldn&#039;t it be a good idea to demand that the utility industry capture and sequester its carbon pollution, precisely b/c it DOES increase the retail price of electricity?  I don&#039;t see that &#039;expensive&#039; is a problem, as long as there is no govt subsidy covering it. 

An increased price for coal-based electricity would do more to commercialize  efficiency and renewable alternatives than anything else, right?

Also, a mandate to capture CO2 would favor gasification over pulverized coal.  this would allow other pollutants to be easily removed from the exhaust. underground gasification would allow use of the resource w/o surface disturbance. These are a lot of potential pluses.

I think you are reacting against this technology based on the idea that it is a permanent solution underwritten by taxpayers -- when instead it should be considered a temporary transitional technology imposed on the utilities by law, w/o subsidy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why wouldn&#8217;t it be a good idea to demand that the utility industry capture and sequester its carbon pollution, precisely b/c it DOES increase the retail price of electricity?  I don&#8217;t see that &#8216;expensive&#8217; is a problem, as long as there is no govt subsidy covering it. </p>
<p>An increased price for coal-based electricity would do more to commercialize  efficiency and renewable alternatives than anything else, right?</p>
<p>Also, a mandate to capture CO2 would favor gasification over pulverized coal.  this would allow other pollutants to be easily removed from the exhaust. underground gasification would allow use of the resource w/o surface disturbance. These are a lot of potential pluses.</p>
<p>I think you are reacting against this technology based on the idea that it is a permanent solution underwritten by taxpayers &#8212; when instead it should be considered a temporary transitional technology imposed on the utilities by law, w/o subsidy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
