<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weyerhaeuser&#8217;s Evil Vision for the Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://understory.ran.org/2007/08/02/weyerhaeusers-evil-vision-for-the-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://understory.ran.org/2007/08/02/weyerhaeusers-evil-vision-for-the-future/</link>
	<description>The Understory is the official blog of Rainforest Action Network.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:33:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Twyla</title>
		<link>http://understory.ran.org/2007/08/02/weyerhaeusers-evil-vision-for-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-328762</link>
		<dc:creator>Twyla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://understory.ran.org/2007/08/02/weyerhaeusers-evil-vision-for-the-future/#comment-328762</guid>
		<description>My house is made of lumber and other wood products- my furniture is made from products including pine, hardwoods and particle board.  I shop in grocery stores where most of the food has additives of some kind for increased shelf life. I have had breast cancer.  To call it a &quot;scary disease&quot; tells me that you have never lost a loved one to that or any other disease.  I wonder if you have the capacity to feel anything other than your anger and disrespect.  I do work for Weyco.  They pay a lower to medium wage. I do not believe every thing they say, but I am realistic.  I unplug the sawdust conveyors that make  fiber boards.  I get dust down my back from bark made into deco bark and hog fuel.  I wear safety goggles and other safety equipment when needed, because Weyco has a blanket saftey policy for all employees working in labs or mills, that is to keep debris of anykind from getting in our eyes.  By the way, I took a chemistry class- even for experiments using water and &quot;perfectly safe&quot; materials, saftey goggles where required.  So, yeah, get some education - and as grandpa would do, think before you speak.  Think about where we have been and you will perhaps be less negative about where we are, and more hopeful about where we are going in terms of taking care of the ecosystem.  The sarcastic responses I have read tell me that the writers had no valid argument and so are simply stomping his or her verbal foot, much like a spoiled child.  Have you all ever heard the term - Toxic person?  I was going to bookmark the site-I was interested in learning about Lyptus hardwood.  But having read more comment and articles - I have decided that this site is just a bunch of uneducated rambling.  I call it &quot;evil gossip&quot;.  You should perhaps take a &quot;writing for style and argument&quot; class.  You will learn how to prove the statements that you write.  If you want people to take you seriously then you need to respect them and take them seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My house is made of lumber and other wood products- my furniture is made from products including pine, hardwoods and particle board.  I shop in grocery stores where most of the food has additives of some kind for increased shelf life. I have had breast cancer.  To call it a &#8220;scary disease&#8221; tells me that you have never lost a loved one to that or any other disease.  I wonder if you have the capacity to feel anything other than your anger and disrespect.  I do work for Weyco.  They pay a lower to medium wage. I do not believe every thing they say, but I am realistic.  I unplug the sawdust conveyors that make  fiber boards.  I get dust down my back from bark made into deco bark and hog fuel.  I wear safety goggles and other safety equipment when needed, because Weyco has a blanket saftey policy for all employees working in labs or mills, that is to keep debris of anykind from getting in our eyes.  By the way, I took a chemistry class- even for experiments using water and &#8220;perfectly safe&#8221; materials, saftey goggles where required.  So, yeah, get some education &#8211; and as grandpa would do, think before you speak.  Think about where we have been and you will perhaps be less negative about where we are, and more hopeful about where we are going in terms of taking care of the ecosystem.  The sarcastic responses I have read tell me that the writers had no valid argument and so are simply stomping his or her verbal foot, much like a spoiled child.  Have you all ever heard the term &#8211; Toxic person?  I was going to bookmark the site-I was interested in learning about Lyptus hardwood.  But having read more comment and articles &#8211; I have decided that this site is just a bunch of uneducated rambling.  I call it &#8220;evil gossip&#8221;.  You should perhaps take a &#8220;writing for style and argument&#8221; class.  You will learn how to prove the statements that you write.  If you want people to take you seriously then you need to respect them and take them seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://understory.ran.org/2007/08/02/weyerhaeusers-evil-vision-for-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-121847</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://understory.ran.org/2007/08/02/weyerhaeusers-evil-vision-for-the-future/#comment-121847</guid>
		<description>WOW!  You can talk to trees!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW!  You can talk to trees!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://understory.ran.org/2007/08/02/weyerhaeusers-evil-vision-for-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-117538</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://understory.ran.org/2007/08/02/weyerhaeusers-evil-vision-for-the-future/#comment-117538</guid>
		<description>Seriously, SWAB, what does that have to do with anything? They grow trees in greenhouses? Great. They stop people from destroying their trees, because they plan to destroy them instead? Great. Now tell them to stop destroying the homeland of the Grassy Narrows First Nation. And to use a real forestry certification instead of a fake industry greenwash. Who is it that needs to do homework?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, SWAB, what does that have to do with anything? They grow trees in greenhouses? Great. They stop people from destroying their trees, because they plan to destroy them instead? Great. Now tell them to stop destroying the homeland of the Grassy Narrows First Nation. And to use a real forestry certification instead of a fake industry greenwash. Who is it that needs to do homework?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Someone with a brain</title>
		<link>http://understory.ran.org/2007/08/02/weyerhaeusers-evil-vision-for-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-117178</link>
		<dc:creator>Someone with a brain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 06:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://understory.ran.org/2007/08/02/weyerhaeusers-evil-vision-for-the-future/#comment-117178</guid>
		<description>Luke, you obviously didn&#039;t take the time to do your homework or even watch the video.  If you listened, they stopped the yews from being destroyed by people who were stripping the bark.  they are growing 3-5 year old trees in a greenhouse for the drug.  Hardly a pass on the environment.  You people would have a lot more credibility if you educated yourselves on these things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luke, you obviously didn&#8217;t take the time to do your homework or even watch the video.  If you listened, they stopped the yews from being destroyed by people who were stripping the bark.  they are growing 3-5 year old trees in a greenhouse for the drug.  Hardly a pass on the environment.  You people would have a lot more credibility if you educated yourselves on these things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://understory.ran.org/2007/08/02/weyerhaeusers-evil-vision-for-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-117075</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://understory.ran.org/2007/08/02/weyerhaeusers-evil-vision-for-the-future/#comment-117075</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, HHM, any company that sells a product used to treat scary diseases should be given a free pass on the environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, HHM, any company that sells a product used to treat scary diseases should be given a free pass on the environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: He Hate Me</title>
		<link>http://understory.ran.org/2007/08/02/weyerhaeusers-evil-vision-for-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-116993</link>
		<dc:creator>He Hate Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 03:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://understory.ran.org/2007/08/02/weyerhaeusers-evil-vision-for-the-future/#comment-116993</guid>
		<description>As usual, you radical liberals have misconstrued the efforts of the last honest forest company in the industry.  I see that you left out the part where they produce paclitaxel, which has saved thousands of lives that would have otherwise been lost to breast cancer.  Also, they could have given into the financial pressures of Wall Street and sold their land to a REIT instead of managing it in a responsible way.  But why bring up any objective evidence?  After all, isn&#039;t your whole reason for being to construe the facts in such a way that you can manipulate others?  Why don&#039;t you go back to what you are good at:  climbing trees in protest as though they were your own personal soapbox to scream about injustices that are poorly thought out so you can feel better about yourselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual, you radical liberals have misconstrued the efforts of the last honest forest company in the industry.  I see that you left out the part where they produce paclitaxel, which has saved thousands of lives that would have otherwise been lost to breast cancer.  Also, they could have given into the financial pressures of Wall Street and sold their land to a REIT instead of managing it in a responsible way.  But why bring up any objective evidence?  After all, isn&#8217;t your whole reason for being to construe the facts in such a way that you can manipulate others?  Why don&#8217;t you go back to what you are good at:  climbing trees in protest as though they were your own personal soapbox to scream about injustices that are poorly thought out so you can feel better about yourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrandonXVX</title>
		<link>http://understory.ran.org/2007/08/02/weyerhaeusers-evil-vision-for-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-116924</link>
		<dc:creator>BrandonXVX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://understory.ran.org/2007/08/02/weyerhaeusers-evil-vision-for-the-future/#comment-116924</guid>
		<description>^Haha! I figured he had to have some financial interest in the loggging industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^Haha! I figured he had to have some financial interest in the loggging industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brant</title>
		<link>http://understory.ran.org/2007/08/02/weyerhaeusers-evil-vision-for-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-115367</link>
		<dc:creator>Brant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://understory.ran.org/2007/08/02/weyerhaeusers-evil-vision-for-the-future/#comment-115367</guid>
		<description>John, your IP address indicates you work for Weyerhaeuser. Please get back to work and think about changing things from within. Please remind &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://understory.ran.org/2006/09/11/weyerhaeuser-under-my-skin/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Matt&lt;/a&gt;&quot; to do the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, your IP address indicates you work for Weyerhaeuser. Please get back to work and think about changing things from within. Please remind &#8220;<a href="http://understory.ran.org/2006/09/11/weyerhaeuser-under-my-skin/" rel="nofollow">Matt</a>&#8221; to do the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan</title>
		<link>http://understory.ran.org/2007/08/02/weyerhaeusers-evil-vision-for-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-115138</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 23:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://understory.ran.org/2007/08/02/weyerhaeusers-evil-vision-for-the-future/#comment-115138</guid>
		<description>&quot;Products would not be made for profit if there were not demand for them.&quot;

First, this is not true. Companies say it all the time but it doesn&#039;t stop them from having marketing departments. Do you think anyone would buy &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tagbodyspray.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tag Bodyspray&lt;/a&gt; if it wasn&#039;t accompanied by commercials featuring dorky guys getting all the girls?

Second, to the degree that this &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; true, it&#039;s easily manipulated. For instance, Weyerhaeuser&#039;s subsidiary Quadrant Homes markets the houses they build as &quot;Built Green&quot; even though the wood is stolen from Grassy Narrows&#039; traditional territory. Other green builders shudder at Quadrant, saying they&#039;re diluting the &quot;green&quot; label.

There&#039;s demand for environmentally friendly wood that doesn&#039;t come bundled with human rights violations but Weyerhaeuser has realized it&#039;s easier to stick a &quot;Green!&quot; label on something than actually make it sustainable. They might as well spray it with some Tag, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Products would not be made for profit if there were not demand for them.&#8221;</p>
<p>First, this is not true. Companies say it all the time but it doesn&#8217;t stop them from having marketing departments. Do you think anyone would buy <a href="http://www.tagbodyspray.com/" rel="nofollow">Tag Bodyspray</a> if it wasn&#8217;t accompanied by commercials featuring dorky guys getting all the girls?</p>
<p>Second, to the degree that this <em>is</em> true, it&#8217;s easily manipulated. For instance, Weyerhaeuser&#8217;s subsidiary Quadrant Homes markets the houses they build as &#8220;Built Green&#8221; even though the wood is stolen from Grassy Narrows&#8217; traditional territory. Other green builders shudder at Quadrant, saying they&#8217;re diluting the &#8220;green&#8221; label.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s demand for environmentally friendly wood that doesn&#8217;t come bundled with human rights violations but Weyerhaeuser has realized it&#8217;s easier to stick a &#8220;Green!&#8221; label on something than actually make it sustainable. They might as well spray it with some Tag, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://understory.ran.org/2007/08/02/weyerhaeusers-evil-vision-for-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-115094</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 20:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://understory.ran.org/2007/08/02/weyerhaeusers-evil-vision-for-the-future/#comment-115094</guid>
		<description>So, &lt;i&gt;&quot;Every substitute for wood in products necessary for our society have far greater environmental impacts than well-managed forestlands&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Really? So we need use wood in ice cream? And soup?

Are you really saying that it would hurt the environment more to eat soup with no trees in it? 

hmm . . . sounds suspect to me John.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, <i>&#8220;Every substitute for wood in products necessary for our society have far greater environmental impacts than well-managed forestlands&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Really? So we need use wood in ice cream? And soup?</p>
<p>Are you really saying that it would hurt the environment more to eat soup with no trees in it? </p>
<p>hmm . . . sounds suspect to me John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
