<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Effects on Rainforests: A History</title>
	<atom:link href="http://understory.ran.org/2007/03/01/the-effects-on-rainforests-a-history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://understory.ran.org/2007/03/01/the-effects-on-rainforests-a-history/</link>
	<description>The Understory is the official blog of Rainforest Action Network.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:08:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ...</title>
		<link>http://understory.ran.org/2007/03/01/the-effects-on-rainforests-a-history/comment-page-1/#comment-73199</link>
		<dc:creator>...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://understory.ran.org/2007/03/01/the-effects-on-rainforests-a-history/#comment-73199</guid>
		<description>:O</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:O</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Japhet</title>
		<link>http://understory.ran.org/2007/03/01/the-effects-on-rainforests-a-history/comment-page-1/#comment-70311</link>
		<dc:creator>Japhet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 17:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://understory.ran.org/2007/03/01/the-effects-on-rainforests-a-history/#comment-70311</guid>
		<description>Glen, thannks for the comment. While I appreciate the sense of urgency you feel (as we feel it too) I really should say that this blog post in no way states that RAN supports ancient forest development.  If anything, it was a review of research done by a well-accomplished tropical rainforest scientist. If you read the last paragraph of my post I state pretty clearly that Piperno does not vindicate current destruction of the rainforest. If you feel the article promotes forest destruction then you&#039;ll understand my explanation about &quot;the danger&quot; that this type of message can breed. 

I certainly hope we can develop a sense of &quot;hope for global ecological sustainability&quot; as it&#039;s what helps drive the change we wish to see. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glen, thannks for the comment. While I appreciate the sense of urgency you feel (as we feel it too) I really should say that this blog post in no way states that RAN supports ancient forest development.  If anything, it was a review of research done by a well-accomplished tropical rainforest scientist. If you read the last paragraph of my post I state pretty clearly that Piperno does not vindicate current destruction of the rainforest. If you feel the article promotes forest destruction then you&#8217;ll understand my explanation about &#8220;the danger&#8221; that this type of message can breed. </p>
<p>I certainly hope we can develop a sense of &#8220;hope for global ecological sustainability&#8221; as it&#8217;s what helps drive the change we wish to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://understory.ran.org/2007/03/01/the-effects-on-rainforests-a-history/comment-page-1/#comment-70303</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 16:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://understory.ran.org/2007/03/01/the-effects-on-rainforests-a-history/#comment-70303</guid>
		<description>this had no info that helped me !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i got AN F- and thats not even possible!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this had no info that helped me !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br />
i got AN F- and thats not even possible!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Glen Barry</title>
		<link>http://understory.ran.org/2007/03/01/the-effects-on-rainforests-a-history/comment-page-1/#comment-70273</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Glen Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 13:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://understory.ran.org/2007/03/01/the-effects-on-rainforests-a-history/#comment-70273</guid>
		<description>It is outrageous that Rainforest Action Network supports the industrial logging of ancient primary and old-growth forests. So many ancient forests have been lost or diminished already that there is no hope for global ecological sustainability. I urge you to reconsider your approach and come out with a strong statement of &quot;No Ancient Forest Industrial Development Ever&quot;. If not now, when will this be necessary. You are so tough on coal and so weak on rainforest conservation. This is going to be a campaign issues against your organization. I urge you to head off an internician battle on the issue, it is really an ecological no-brainer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is outrageous that Rainforest Action Network supports the industrial logging of ancient primary and old-growth forests. So many ancient forests have been lost or diminished already that there is no hope for global ecological sustainability. I urge you to reconsider your approach and come out with a strong statement of &#8220;No Ancient Forest Industrial Development Ever&#8221;. If not now, when will this be necessary. You are so tough on coal and so weak on rainforest conservation. This is going to be a campaign issues against your organization. I urge you to head off an internician battle on the issue, it is really an ecological no-brainer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

